<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Business Logic Flaws on Secure Techies | Managed IT &amp; Cybersecurity in Southern California</title><link>https://securetechie.com/tags/business-logic-flaws/</link><description>Recent content in Business Logic Flaws on Secure Techies | Managed IT &amp; Cybersecurity in Southern California</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 00:00:00 -0700</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://securetechie.com/tags/business-logic-flaws/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Why Manual Penetration Testing Is Preferred Over Automated Testing</title><link>https://securetechie.com/blog/manual-penetration-testing-vs-automated/</link><pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate><guid>https://securetechie.com/blog/manual-penetration-testing-vs-automated/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Here&amp;rsquo;s the short version: &lt;strong&gt;manual penetration testing is preferred over automated testing for certain security assessments because a person can judge context, chain findings, and follow authentication and API flows that scanners only pattern-match.&lt;/strong&gt; Tools such as Nessus, Qualys, and Burp Suite are excellent at coverage. They are not a substitute for thoughtful human testing on a complex, business-critical system.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>